H-6479: Ignore Cursor plan documents in markdownlint

[vilkinsons]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Does what it says in the title, and renames a couple of references to the Block Protocol Graph Module/Type System (way more to go).

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 23, 2026 7:25pm

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	May 23, 2026 7:25pm
petrinaut	Skipped	Comment	May 23, 2026 7:25pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Low risk config/docs-only change: updates markdownlint ignore patterns and adjusts README wording/links; no runtime code paths affected.

Overview
Updates markdownlint-cli2 configuration to ignore generated Cursor plan documents under **/.cursor/plans/**.

Renames the Rust type-system crate README to position it as SemType, adds a canonical spec link (semtype.org/spec), and reframes the Block Protocol type system as the deprecated predecessor.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit f129a5d. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates linting ignores to exclude Cursor plan artifacts and refreshes the Rust type-system README to reflect the SemType branding.
Details: Adds a canonical spec link to semtype.org/spec and clarifies the old Block Protocol type system RFC is deprecated.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 2 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.82%. Comparing base (b9ecc19) to head (f129a5d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8733      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.82%   58.82%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1328     1328              
  Lines      126882   126882              
  Branches     5790     5790              
==========================================
- Hits        74644    74642       -2     
- Misses      51357    51359       +2     
  Partials      881      881              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	77.88% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing d/miscupdates (f129a5d) with main (b9ecc19)}

See the output of git range-diff at https://github.com/hashintel/hash/actions/runs/26341182745

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.422 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.762 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.960 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.616 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.328 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.837 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.686 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.951 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.805 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.445 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.88 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.931 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.783 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.718 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.458 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.920 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.226 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$82.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 367 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.783 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$50.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$60.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.638 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$46.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.645 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$423 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.08 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 469 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.723 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$289 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.01 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.757 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.161 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.769 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.087 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$34.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.425 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$33.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.605 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$91.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 510 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.653 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 487 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.378 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$98.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 574 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 503 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 527 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 508 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.404 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$96.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.459 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 468 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.997 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 435 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$145 \mathrm{ms} \pm 420 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$154 \mathrm{ms} \pm 406 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 435 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$585 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.02 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.514 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph