Repository navigation
[copilot-session-insights] Daily Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-10-29 #72891
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot Session Insights. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #73044. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🤖 Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-10-29
Executive Summary
temporal_analysis_confound_controlled(roll=14/100, <30 threshold)Key Metrics
Success Factors ✅
Patterns associated with "success" in today's metadata (caveat: no conversation logs, so these reflect CI-gate/review-bot workflow identity, not agentic task quality):
Review-bot / code-scanning channel: 6/11 firings resolved successfully (54.5%)
Core CI-gate channel: 9/22 firings resolved successfully (40.9%)
Single-branch concentration enabled clean comparison: 100% of today's 50 runs (ties the 2026-10-24 all-time-high) fired on one branch,
copilot/improve-claim-footer-rendering, spread naturally over 6.5 hours rather than a one-second burst — this made today's experimental confound-controlled hourly analysis possible (see Experimental Analysis below).[Note: with 0/50 conversation logs, we cannot assess prompt quality, context richness, or task-description patterns as "success factors" — only workflow-identity and timing data are available.]
Failure Signals⚠️
True-agentic channel total stall: Squad, Agentic Commands, and Squad Implement Worker (17 combined firings) were 0% resolved — every single firing ended
action_required(gate-wait state). This is consistent with historical "provenance_inversion": today is the 3rd known 100%-bot-driven day on record (after 2026-09-16 and 2026-09-17), meaning all 15 raw successes came from review-bot/CI-gate automation, none from the true agentic-completion channel.Localized 13:00 UTC failure cluster (see Experimental Analysis): a confound-controlled hourly breakdown found only 1/10 non-gate-channel runs succeeded in the 13:00 UTC hour, versus ~60% in the adjacent 10:00 and 15:00 hours — a real, isolated dip that survives controlling for both branch identity and workflow-mix.
Core CI-gate channel underperformed its historical norm: 40.9% today vs the review-bot channel's 54.5%, continuing a pattern where core CI gates (CJS/CWI/CGO/Work Queue*) run closer to a coin-flip than advisory/review-bot workflows.
[Failure-rate-by-prompt-characteristic analysis is unavailable — no conversation logs were recoverable to inspect task descriptions.]
Prompt Quality Analysis 📝
Per-Prompt Breakdown
Unavailable this run. 0/50 conversation transcripts were recoverable (42nd+ consecutive day of the ongoing data-pipeline regression). The fetched population consists of CI-gate, review-bot, and code-scanning workflow runs, which do not carry natural-language task prompts in the same sense as a direct Copilot coding-agent session — even on days with log recovery, prompt-quality scoring has historically been limited to the small number of true-agentic firings.
No high/low-quality prompt examples can be extracted or reported today.
Orphaned Branch Escalation Alerts 🚨
Summary
Escalation Candidate Details
Escalation Candidates
✅ No orphaned branches exceed the escalation threshold today. Only 1 in-progress Actions run existed system-wide at check time (this analysis workflow itself, running on
main), and no open-PR branch had any concurrent gate firings.CI Waste Estimate
Notable Observations
Loop Detection and Session Diagnostics
Loop Detection
Tool Usage
Context Issues
Workflow-Identity Channel Breakdown (metadata-only substitute)
Experimental Analysis
This run included experimental strategy:
temporal_analysis_confound_controlled(30% roll triggered; roll=14)This refines a prior finding from 2026-10-17's
temporal_analysisstrategy, which detected an hour-of-day success-rate gap but concluded it was fully confounded with branch identity (different branches dominated different hours that day) and recommended re-testing on "a day with a single dominant branch spanning multiple hours." Today was exactly that day: 100% of runs (50/50) fired on one branch (copilot/improve-claim-footer-rendering) across a natural 6.5-hour window.Method: Held branch constant (trivially, 100% concentration) and additionally excluded the provenance-ambiguous true-agentic channel (Squad/Agentic Commands/Squad Implement Worker — always
action_requiredby construction, never a real pass/fail signal) to control for workflow-mix confound.Findings:
Effectiveness: High — this is the first time the hour-of-day hypothesis has been tested with both branch identity and workflow-mix held constant, and a genuine signal survived: a cross-workflow failure cluster isolated to a single hour, bracketed by ~60% success immediately before and after.
Recommendation: Keep. Pull Actions job logs for the 8 workflows that failed in the 13:00 UTC window today to look for a shared root cause (e.g., a transient runner-capacity or shared-dependency incident) rather than independent, unrelated failures. Repeat this confound-controlled hourly method whenever another single-branch-dominant day recurs.
Actionable Recommendations
For Users Writing Task Descriptions
For System Improvements
Fix the conversation/event-log data pipeline: This is the single highest-impact gap in the entire analysis program. It has now failed on 42+ of the last ~57 recorded days, blocking all turn-by-turn behavioral analysis (tool usage, token efficiency, loop detection, context-confusion detection, prompt-quality scoring) described in this workflow's mission. Every section above that depends on conversation logs has returned "unavailable" for well over a month.
Investigate the 13:00 UTC cross-workflow failure cluster: 8 structurally unrelated workflows failed almost simultaneously today, pointing at a possible shared transient cause (runner capacity, external dependency, rate limiting) rather than independent bugs.
Re-examine the true-agentic channel's 0%-resolved days: Squad/Agentic Commands/Squad Implement Worker being 100%
action_required(not a true failure, but a gate-wait state) continues to make raw completion-rate comparisons misleading across days. Consider separating "awaiting human/gate action" from "failed" in the primary completion metric reported to the team.For Tool Development
copilot-session-data-fetchshared module has not returned usable conversation logs on 42+ of the last 57 recorded days. Given the consistency and duration of this gap, it merits root-cause investigation as its own engineering task rather than continued silent "0/50" reporting.Historical Trends and Statistical Summary
Trends Over Time
Statistical Summary
📈 Session Trends Analysis
Completion Patterns
Completion rate rebounded +22.0 points from 10-28's unusually low 8.0% to today's 30.0%, landing modestly below the ~57-day mean of 37%. The underlying picture remains volatile: raw completion has swung between 4% and 80% over the last month with no sustained upward or downward trend, and the true-agentic channel specifically contributed zero resolved sessions today.
Duration & Efficiency
Both average (90.3 min) and median (36.6 min) duration spiked to the highest levels seen in the last 30 recorded days, reflecting today's runs being measured across a genuine 6.5-hour single-branch window rather than a shorter, more typical multi-branch spread. Loop/retry counts remain unplottable — conversation logs needed for that signal have been unavailable for 42+ consecutive days.
Next Steps
Analysis generated automatically on 2026-10-29
Run ID: 40831247254
Workflow: Copilot Session Insights
All reactions