Repository navigation
[developer-docs] Developer Documentation Consolidation - 2026-10-24 #71657
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-10-27T13:39:21.048Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
Weekly maintenance pass over
scratchpad/: scanned all 66 in-scope spec files, found 0 new tone issues, and closed out a 2-run-old formatting backlog item instead of deferring it again.scratchpad/dev.mdbumped to v9.29. Pull request: see the one opened alongside this discussion from branchdocs/consolidate-dev-instructions-2026-10-24.Full Consolidation Report
Scope
scratchpad/(per the workflow's "Current Context").specs/was left out of scope — it holds a separate SPDD compliance/ledger/work-queue tree (e.g.specs/ledger/,specs/outcomes/,specs/work-queue/, several*-compliance/dirs), not consolidated-documentation source material. This matches the v9.27 decision recorded indev.md's own changelog.scratchpad/*.mdfiles (dev.mdand thesmoke-test-22422877284.mdtest artifact excluded, per established precedent).dev.md's Related Documentation section — all 66 are already linked, 0 new files since v9.28.Tone Adjustments
0 found. Searched for marketing/subjective language (
powerful,seamless,effortless,amazing,magical,intuitive,easy to,flexible,comprehensive,robust,perfect,smart,incredibly, etc.) across all in-scope files. The only matches were previously-accepted legitimate usage, unchanged from prior runs:mdflow.md/mdflow-comparison.md: "no magic" / "no magic mapping" — factual negations, not claims.git-ai.md: "sandbox contract is proven" — technical claim about validation status, not a subjective adjective.Formatting Backlog Resolved
v9.27 flagged a "bold-style pseudo-heading" pattern (
**Field**:used as a standalone line, 100+ instances) inrepo-memory.md,metrics-glossary.md, andtoken-budget-guidelines.md, deferred as "a large mechanical change, better handled as its own dedicated pass." v9.28 deferred it again without re-inspecting the actual content.This run read the flagged lines directly:
repo-memory.md(lines 119, 124, 143, 157, 159, 161, 168, ...):**Files**:,**Key Functions**:,**Path Usage**:,**File**:,**Purpose**:,**Environment Variables**:each introduce a bullet list or code block within an existing###-level subsection (e.g. "### 1. Go Layer"), repeated consistently per implementation layer (Go / Shell Script / ...).metrics-glossary.md:**Used By**:and**Example Scopes**:repeat per glossary entry with the same structured-label role.token-budget-guidelines.md: no standalone instances of the pattern exist at all — the 100+ count was driven entirely by the other two files.Conclusion: these are structured field labels (a File/Purpose/Environment-Variables/Path-Usage style spec-sheet pattern), not section titles written in bold instead of
##/###/####syntax. Converting them to real headings would add dozens of trivial TOC-visible headings per file and reduce readability rather than improve it. This is closed out as a reviewed non-issue rather than left open for a fourth run.Consolidation Statistics
dev.mdversionHistorical Comparison
Steering
Issue #71654 (this run's steering issue) had no comments, so no
steer-tagged feedback to incorporate.Next Steps
dev.mdchangelog entry and the backlog-resolution reasoning in the pull request.Run: §40098165078
All reactions