diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 64a7efb..4a69eb6 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ cp commands/pressure-test.md ~/.claude/commands/      # personal, all projects
 # or: .claude/commands/  for one project
 ```
 
-Then `/pressure-test` (tests the current direction) or `/pressure-test <a specific decision>`.
+Then `/pressure-test <a specific decision>` to test one call in depth, or bare `/pressure-test` to sweep every solution the session proposed — an inventory with a verdict on each (the holds stated as plainly as the fails), plus the section only the sweep produces: the decisions that were never examined at all.
 
 ## The `/sidenote` command
 
diff --git a/commands/pressure-test.md b/commands/pressure-test.md
index 5ffe71e..735bb19 100644
--- a/commands/pressure-test.md
+++ b/commands/pressure-test.md
@@ -3,7 +3,13 @@ description: Pressure-test the current approach against scalability, long-term,
 argument-hint: [decision or approach to test — optional]
 ---
 
-Run the decision test on **$ARGUMENTS** — or, if that's empty, on the approach currently on the table in this conversation.
+Run the decision test on **$ARGUMENTS** — or, if that's empty, on every solution this conversation has proposed.
+
+**With no argument, sweep — don't zoom.** The targeted form asks *is this the right call?* about one decision; the no-argument form asks *did we miss anything?* about all of them. Same evidence standard, same ledger — a wider surface, not a softer test.
+
+- **Inventory first.** List every decision the session actually made, including the ones made in passing — a default accepted without discussion is an entry, not a footnote.
+- **Rule per item, and state the holds as plainly as the fails** — *holds / holds with a caveat / fails*. A sweep that prints only problems is a bug list, not a coverage report; manufacturing objections to look thorough is the failure mode this form is most prone to.
+- **Then the section only this form can produce: what was never examined.** Defaults taken silently, options never raised, questions nobody asked. "Did we see everything" is answered by the list of what we *didn't* look at — re-litigating what we already argued about is not coverage.
 
 The governing question for the choice: **whatever is scalable, long term, and cannot be done in a more efficient way.**