The claim made on the website, that "indenting multiple lines" is a missing feature for vim is actually untrue, even for the old vi:
You correctly say that > is indent and < is unindent.
Now those operators can be combined with a motion, for example the infamous h, j, k or l for left, up, down or right respectively, which means that "indenting the next three lines" becomes:
Which translates to :
v "visual mode" (select stuff)3 "repeat" the next thing "3 times"j "move one line down" (which is being repeated 3 times)> "indent"
So the whole translated "sentence" (it is a very reasonable way to think of those "chains" of commands as sentences, you can even construct a complete formal language for them) would be this:
visually select 3 lines down, indent that
Another example would be to indent everything inside a certain block delimited by a curly bracket (for example useful in programming), or indent one paragraph. That would look like this:
Which translates to
v again, "visual mode" (select something)i "inside" (this is a modifier for addressing a text object. A bit more on that in the next bullet point.)} the delimiter for the "inside" from before. This means, that the text object we want to interact with is everything inside the nearest curly brackets.> "indent" again
visually select everything inside the nearest curly brackets, indent that
This is actually the biggest difference in design philosophy of vi/vim and virtually every other editor, and also what makes it such a great tool for increasing productivity: You can quite literally speak with vim in some sort of "sentences" to tell it what to do. Combined with the extensibility of newer versions, this creates virtually endless options to chain these commands together.
The claim made on the website, that "indenting multiple lines" is a missing feature for vim is actually untrue, even for the old vi:
You correctly say that
>is indent and<is unindent.Now those operators can be combined with a motion, for example the infamous
h,j,korlfor left, up, down or right respectively, which means that "indenting the next three lines" becomes:Which translates to :
v"visual mode" (select stuff)3"repeat" the next thing "3 times"j"move one line down" (which is being repeated 3 times)>"indent"So the whole translated "sentence" (it is a very reasonable way to think of those "chains" of commands as sentences, you can even construct a complete formal language for them) would be this:
Another example would be to indent everything inside a certain block delimited by a curly bracket (for example useful in programming), or indent one paragraph. That would look like this:
Which translates to
vagain, "visual mode" (select something)i"inside" (this is a modifier for addressing a text object. A bit more on that in the next bullet point.)}the delimiter for the "inside" from before. This means, that the text object we want to interact with is everything inside the nearest curly brackets.>"indent" againThis is actually the biggest difference in design philosophy of vi/vim and virtually every other editor, and also what makes it such a great tool for increasing productivity: You can quite literally speak with vim in some sort of "sentences" to tell it what to do. Combined with the extensibility of newer versions, this creates virtually endless options to chain these commands together.