diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md
index 9ee5d183..792fd22b 100644
--- a/CHANGES.md
+++ b/CHANGES.md
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
   * `SignAsBatchPart` no longer filters its inner-transaction loop on `n is JsonObject` either. That guard cannot fire - the gate above refuses such an element first, shown by mutation - but a silent skip is the wrong thing to leave behind, and every other malformed input in that loop is refused rather than dropped
   * `Batch.Validate` called such an element null in its message when it was, for instance, a string. It now says what is actually wrong
 
+* **`GetBatchSignerAccounts` no longer rewrites the batch it is asked to report on** (#161). The method returns the root account and the accounts required to sign, and it also replaced `RawTransactions[i].RawTransaction` in the caller's own dictionary with a converted copy - the `IEnumerable` branch aliases an element that is already a `Dictionary`, so the assignment landed in the caller's object. It is the gate every batch-signing path reaches through `VerifyBatchSubmitter`, so this happened on every signature.
+  * the conversion is still made, for reading; only the store-back is gone. No consumer needed it: every reader of `RawTransaction` works from a `JsonNode` built by re-serializing the transaction, not from the dictionary that was passed in
+  * that the two representations sign identically is now pinned by a test of its own, since it is the property that makes dropping the store-back safe rather than merely tidy
+
 ## 11.1.0.0 08/27/2026
 
 * **The signing path builds its `JsonSerializerOptions` once** (#147). `XrplBinaryCodec.ObjectToJsonNode` constructed a fresh instance on every call, and every signing operation goes through it - `Encode`, `EncodeForSigning`, `EncodeForSigningClaim` and `EncodeForMultiSigning` all route there. Measured end to end on `EncodeForSigning`, 50 000 calls: **1075.8 ms and 14458 B/op before, 621.8 ms and 13601 B/op after** - 1.73x, and 857 fewer bytes each call. The encoded blob is unchanged, hashing identically either way.
diff --git a/Tests/Xrpl.Tests/Wallet/TestUBatchSigningV11.cs b/Tests/Xrpl.Tests/Wallet/TestUBatchSigningV11.cs
index e0f414a2..a8424462 100644
--- a/Tests/Xrpl.Tests/Wallet/TestUBatchSigningV11.cs
+++ b/Tests/Xrpl.Tests/Wallet/TestUBatchSigningV11.cs
@@ -298,6 +298,71 @@ public void TestUSignAsBatchPart_NonObjectRawTransactionsEntry_Throws()
             Assert.AreEqual("RawTransactions[1] must be an object.", error.Message);
         }
 
+        private static Dictionary<string, object> BatchWithWrapperValue(string outerAccount, object rawTransactionValue) =>
+            new Dictionary<string, object>
+            {
+                ["TransactionType"] = "Batch",
+                ["Account"] = outerAccount,
+                ["Sequence"] = 3u,
+                ["Flags"] = TfAllOrNothing,
+                ["Fee"] = "40",
+                ["RawTransactions"] = new List<object>
+                {
+                    new Dictionary<string, object> { ["RawTransaction"] = rawTransactionValue }
+                }
+            };
+
+        [TestMethod]
+        public void TestUSignAsBatchPart_InnerRepresentationDoesNotChangeTheBlob()
+        {
+            XrplWallet submitter = XrplWallet.Generate();
+            XrplWallet participant = XrplWallet.Generate();
+            XrplWallet destination = XrplWallet.Generate();
+
+            JsonObject inner = InnerPayment(participant.ClassicAddress, destination.ClassicAddress, 20);
+
+            // The same batch twice: one wrapper holds a JsonObject, the other an equivalent
+            // Dictionary. They describe the same transaction, so they must sign to the same blob.
+            Dictionary<string, object> asNode = BatchWithWrapperValue(submitter.ClassicAddress, inner.DeepClone());
+            Dictionary<string, object> asDictionary = BatchWithWrapperValue(
+                submitter.ClassicAddress,
+                JsonSerializer.Deserialize<Dictionary<string, object>>(inner.ToJsonString(), XrplJsonOptions.Default)!);
+
+            SignatureResult fromNode = participant.SignAsBatchPart(asNode, multisign: false, signingFor: participant.ClassicAddress);
+            SignatureResult fromDictionary = participant.SignAsBatchPart(asDictionary, multisign: false, signingFor: participant.ClassicAddress);
+
+            Assert.AreEqual(fromDictionary.TxBlob, fromNode.TxBlob,
+                "The representation the caller happened to use must not change what gets signed.");
+        }
+
+        [TestMethod]
+        public void TestUGetBatchSignerAccounts_LeavesTheCallersDictionaryAlone()
+        {
+            XrplWallet submitter = XrplWallet.Generate();
+            XrplWallet participant = XrplWallet.Generate();
+            XrplWallet destination = XrplWallet.Generate();
+
+            JsonObject inner = InnerPayment(participant.ClassicAddress, destination.ClassicAddress, 20);
+            Dictionary<string, object> wrapper = new Dictionary<string, object> { ["RawTransaction"] = inner };
+
+            Dictionary<string, object> tx = new Dictionary<string, object>
+            {
+                ["TransactionType"] = "Batch",
+                ["Account"] = submitter.ClassicAddress,
+                ["RawTransactions"] = new List<object> { wrapper }
+            };
+
+            BatchSignerAccounts accounts = tx.GetBatchSignerAccounts();
+
+            Assert.AreSame(inner, wrapper["RawTransaction"],
+                "The method reports the accounts of a batch; it must not rewrite the batch it was given.");
+
+            // And the guarantee is not bought by the method having stopped doing its work.
+            Assert.AreEqual(submitter.ClassicAddress, accounts.Root);
+            Assert.AreEqual(1, accounts.Raw.Count);
+            Assert.AreEqual(participant.ClassicAddress, accounts.Raw[0]);
+        }
+
         [TestMethod]
         public void TestUGetBatchSignerAccounts_JsonArrayOfSerializableWrappers_Accepted()
         {
diff --git a/Xrpl/Models/Utils/BatchUtils.cs b/Xrpl/Models/Utils/BatchUtils.cs
index e37749e3..ba0c4a3c 100644
--- a/Xrpl/Models/Utils/BatchUtils.cs
+++ b/Xrpl/Models/Utils/BatchUtils.cs
@@ -112,12 +112,14 @@ public static BatchSignerAccounts GetBatchSignerAccounts(this Dictionary<string,
             if (!wrapper.TryGetValue("RawTransaction", out var rawTxObj) || rawTxObj is null)
                 throw new ValidationException("Each RawTransactions item must contain RawTransaction.");
 
-            // convert to pure dictionary
+            // Converted for reading only. The result is deliberately not stored back into the
+            // wrapper: in the IEnumerable branch above, an element that is already a dictionary is
+            // the caller's own, so an assignment here would rewrite the batch this method was only
+            // asked to report on. Nothing downstream needs the stored form - every consumer of
+            // RawTransaction reads it from a JsonNode built by re-serializing the transaction.
             var rawTx = rawTxObj as Dictionary<string, object>
                         ?? ToObjectDictionary(rawTxObj, $"RawTransactions[{i}].RawTransaction");
 
-            wrapper["RawTransaction"] = rawTx;
-
             if (!rawTx.TryGetValue("Account", out object accObj) || accObj is null)
                 throw new ValidationException("Each RawTransaction must contain Account.");