diff --git a/changelog.d/hub-review-followups-2026-10-25.changed.md b/changelog.d/hub-review-followups-2026-10-25.changed.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..504ff14594
--- /dev/null
+++ b/changelog.d/hub-review-followups-2026-10-25.changed.md
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Corrected comments, docstrings and citations from reviews of recently merged pull requests, and added property tests for claimant roles and the Childcare Offer for Wales income sources.
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/remunerative_work_hours.yaml b/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/remunerative_work_hours.yaml
index 0fecad832e..a481b43cca 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/remunerative_work_hours.yaml
+++ b/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/remunerative_work_hours.yaml
@@ -10,3 +10,5 @@ metadata:
       href: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/213/regulation/6
     - title: The Housing Benefit (Persons who have attained the qualifying age for state pension credit) Regulations 2006 reg. 6(1)
       href: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/214/regulation/6
+    - title: The Housing Benefit Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006 reg. 6(1)
+      href: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2006/405/regulation/6
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/economic_assumptions/README.md b/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/economic_assumptions/README.md
index b0db05c16f..a7ef5d5f4f 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/economic_assumptions/README.md
+++ b/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/economic_assumptions/README.md
@@ -237,9 +237,9 @@ and so do the Universal Credit standard allowance and health element indices
 built from it. Housing Benefit non-dependant deduction income bands, DfE
 funding rates, the Childcare Offer for Wales hourly rate and the council tax
 high value surcharge follow the lagged calendar-year CPI projection through
-`indices.obr.lagged_cpi`, pending their own uprating models. The deduction amounts continue to follow September CPI.
-The savings credit threshold and Housing
-Benefit pension-age allowances are within the s150 review, under
+`indices.obr.lagged_cpi`, pending their own uprating models. The deduction
+amounts continue to follow September CPI. The savings credit threshold and
+Housing Benefit pension-age allowances are within the s150 review, under
 [s150(1)(l) and (h)](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/5/section/150),
 even though their increases in practice are linked to earnings rather than
 September CPI.
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/welsh_government/childcare_offer/income/gross_income_sources.yaml b/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/welsh_government/childcare_offer/income/gross_income_sources.yaml
index f1f1afff81..1e14c7c83a 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/welsh_government/childcare_offer/income/gross_income_sources.yaml
+++ b/policyengine_uk/parameters/gov/welsh_government/childcare_offer/income/gross_income_sources.yaml
@@ -53,8 +53,9 @@ values:
   # Maternity Grant, lump_sum_income) or to the household (cost of living
   # payments, the energy rebate, bill credits), because question 10 works out
   # annual income from regular pay and the bonuses a parent expects, read here
-  # as a test of recurring income (question 9's "all payments" points the
-  # other way); and loans, which are repaid (student_loans).
+  # as a test of recurring income (question 8's current-tax-year test and
+  # question 9's "all payments" point the other way); and loans, which are
+  # repaid (student_loans).
   #
   # Data limits, immaterial near £100,000: for a Welsh student the FRS
   # education_grants residual can still hold Childcare Grant and Disabled
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/finance/benefit/family/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/housing_benefit_non_dep_remunerative_work.yaml b/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/finance/benefit/family/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/housing_benefit_non_dep_remunerative_work.yaml
index e12d79e9f4..bb515785bf 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/finance/benefit/family/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/housing_benefit_non_dep_remunerative_work.yaml
+++ b/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/finance/benefit/family/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/housing_benefit_non_dep_remunerative_work.yaml
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 # A non-worker or 15-hour worker with banding income pays 20.40 * 52 =
 # 1,060.80 in 2026-27. One with no banding income keeps the scale's zero:
 # the gate only lowers a deduction until #2007 models the exemptions in
-# reg 74(6)-(10) and reg 55(6)-(9) with the flat charge.
+# reg 74(6), (7), (8) and (10) and reg 55(6)-(9) with the flat charge.
 # A 16-hour worker's wages of 9,000 alone are below 192/week; adding
 # IIDB or child maintenance of 12,000 gives 403.85/week, so 105.20 * 52.
 
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/gov/social_security_scotland/september_cpi_uprating.yaml b/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/gov/social_security_scotland/september_cpi_uprating.yaml
index a2f8077707..236b9110f1 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/gov/social_security_scotland/september_cpi_uprating.yaml
+++ b/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/gov/social_security_scotland/september_cpi_uprating.yaml
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 # Annual model periods use the fiscal-year parameter amounts.
 
 - name: Scottish Child Payment projects to 29.20 a week in April 2027
-  # 28.20 x 1.035 = 29.187 -> 29.20, then 29.20 x 365.25 / 7 = 1523.614286.
+  # 28.20 x 1.035 = 29.187 -> 29.20, then 29.20 x 52 = 1518.40.
   period: 2027
   absolute_error_margin: 0.01
   input:
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/gov/welsh_government/childcare_offer/wales_childcare_offer.yaml b/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/gov/welsh_government/childcare_offer/wales_childcare_offer.yaml
index ea2e486d61..71d1e84660 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/gov/welsh_government/childcare_offer/wales_childcare_offer.yaml
+++ b/policyengine_uk/tests/policy/baseline/gov/welsh_government/childcare_offer/wales_childcare_offer.yaml
@@ -484,8 +484,8 @@
     wales_childcare_offer: 0
 
 # current_education's default formula puts an 18- or 19-year-old in tertiary
-# education when nothing is supplied, so a parent of that age
-# counts as a parent in education (guidance para 71). Survey data supplies
+# education when nothing is supplied, so a parent of that age counts as a
+# parent in education (guidance para 71). Survey data supplies
 # current_education, so this default matters only for household calculations.
 - name: A 19-year-old lone parent with no education input counts as in education by default
   period: 2026
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_child_and_adult_definitions_properties.py b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_child_and_adult_definitions_properties.py
index 24140408c9..bc6ee58fbf 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_child_and_adult_definitions_properties.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_child_and_adult_definitions_properties.py
@@ -44,6 +44,13 @@
    claimant's child either way (the any-age gap).
    Before/after families share one Simulation to avoid repeated
    model construction, but occupy distinct households and benefit units.
+5. Supplied claimant/partner role vectors, valid or not, are returned
+   unchanged on any benefit unit. Widening an unflagged member's gap below
+   the claimant, with the claimant, flags, other members and HBAI adulthood
+   fixed, never makes a member the presumption excludes the partner.
+   Identified parents take priority over the presumption; no other presumed
+   child is a claimant or partner. The two-other-parents exception to the
+   head being the claimant is kept.
 
 Scope: these are tests of the ENCODED statutory limbs, not full entitlement.
 Education status proxies full-time non-advanced study: hours, employment
@@ -249,21 +256,36 @@ def claimants_or_partners(family, any_age_gap=20):
     # couple instead. Age ties go to the earlier member. any_age_gap=None is
     # the rule without the any-age gap, kept for the differential test.
     n = len(family)
-    adult = [not hbai_dependent_child(p, family) for p in family]
-    ages = [p["age"] for p in family]
-    heads = [i for i in range(n) if family[i]["is_benunit_head"] and adult[i]]
-    adults = [i for i in range(n) if adult[i]]
-    if not adults:
+    claimant, adult, presumed = presumption(family, any_age_gap)
+    if claimant is None:
         return [False] * n
-    pool = heads or adults
-    claimant = max(pool, key=lambda i: (ages[i], -i))
+    ages = [p["age"] for p in family]
     parent = [adult[i] and family[i]["is_parent"] for i in range(n)]
     other_parents = [i for i in range(n) if parent[i] and i != claimant]
     if len(other_parents) >= 2 and not parent[claimant]:
         couple = sorted(other_parents, key=lambda i: (-ages[i], i))[:2]
         return [i in couple for i in range(n)]
+    pool = other_parents or [
+        i for i in range(n) if adult[i] and i != claimant and not presumed[i]
+    ]
+    partner = max(pool, key=lambda i: (ages[i], -i)) if pool else None
+    return [i == claimant or i == partner for i in range(n)]
+
+
+def presumption(family, any_age_gap=20):
+    # The reference claimant (None without an HBAI adult), HBAI adulthood and
+    # the members presumed to be the claimant's child, before identified
+    # parents take priority.
+    n = len(family)
+    adult = [not hbai_dependent_child(p, family) for p in family]
+    ages = [p["age"] for p in family]
+    heads = [i for i in range(n) if family[i]["is_benunit_head"] and adult[i]]
+    adults = [i for i in range(n) if adult[i]]
+    if not adults:
+        return None, adult, [False] * n
+    claimant = max(heads or adults, key=lambda i: (ages[i], -i))
     young_child = any(ages[j] < 20 and ages[claimant] - ages[j] >= 16 for j in range(n))
-    flag_unexplained = parent[claimant] and not young_child
+    flag_unexplained = family[claimant]["is_parent"] and not young_child
 
     def presumed_child(i):
         gap = ages[claimant] - ages[i]
@@ -271,11 +293,7 @@ def presumed_child(i):
             return True
         return (ages[i] < 20 or flag_unexplained) and gap >= 16
 
-    pool = other_parents or [
-        i for i in adults if i != claimant and not presumed_child(i)
-    ]
-    partner = max(pool, key=lambda i: (ages[i], -i)) if pool else None
-    return [i == claimant or i == partner for i in range(n)]
+    return claimant, adult, [presumed_child(i) for i in range(n)]
 
 
 def legacy_child_or_young_person(p, claimant):
@@ -992,3 +1010,88 @@ def test_wide_gap_couples_by_head_order_and_with_supplied_roles():
     supplied = simulate(families)
     supplied.set_input("is_claimant_or_partner", YEAR, [True] * 4)
     np.testing.assert_array_equal(supplied.calculate("is_couple", YEAR), [True] * 2)
+
+
+@PROPERTY_SETTINGS
+@given(arbitrary_benefit_units(), st.data())
+def test_supplied_roles_are_returned_unchanged(families, data):
+    # Any Boolean role vector, valid or not, on any benefit unit: a supplied
+    # is_claimant_or_partner is an input, so the model never recomputes it.
+    size = sum(map(len, families))
+    roles = data.draw(st.lists(st.booleans(), min_size=size, max_size=size))
+    sim = simulate(families)
+    sim.set_input("is_claimant_or_partner", YEAR, roles)
+    assert_values(sim, "is_claimant_or_partner", roles)
+
+
+@st.composite
+def widened_gap_pairs(draw):
+    # An adult head (the claimant), flagged or not, an unflagged member aged
+    # 20+ at least 16 years younger, and any other members. The pair is the
+    # unit before and after the member is made younger, holding everything
+    # else fixed.
+    pairs = []
+    for _ in range(draw(st.integers(1, 8))):
+        claimant_age = draw(st.integers(36, 90))
+        family = [
+            person(claimant_age, is_parent=draw(st.booleans()), is_benunit_head=True)
+        ]
+        for _ in range(draw(st.integers(0, 3))):
+            family.append(
+                person(
+                    draw(st.integers(0, claimant_age)),
+                    current_education=draw(st.sampled_from(EDUCATIONS)),
+                    is_in_approved_training=draw(st.booleans()),
+                    is_parent=draw(st.booleans()),
+                )
+            )
+        j = draw(st.integers(1, len(family)))
+        age = draw(st.integers(20, claimant_age - 16))
+        family.insert(j, person(age))
+        younger = [dict(p) for p in family]
+        younger[j]["age"] = draw(st.integers(0, age - 1))
+        pairs.append((family, younger, j))
+    return pairs
+
+
+@PROPERTY_SETTINGS
+@given(widened_gap_pairs())
+def test_a_wider_gap_never_makes_a_presumed_child_the_partner(pairs):
+    # Metamorphic: an unflagged member made younger, so their gap below the
+    # claimant widens, with the claimant, every flag, every other member and
+    # everyone's HBAI adulthood fixed. A member the presumption excludes from
+    # the partner pool stays excluded, so never becomes the partner. The
+    # two-other-parents exception is not asserted away: it never selects an
+    # unflagged member either.
+    cases = []
+    for family, younger, j in pairs:
+        before, after = presumption(family), presumption(younger)
+        held = before[0] == after[0] == 0 and before[1] == after[1]
+        if held and before[2][j]:
+            cases.append((family, younger, j))
+    if not cases:
+        return
+    combined = [unit for family, younger, _ in cases for unit in (family, younger)]
+    roles = simulate(combined).calculate("is_claimant_or_partner", YEAR)
+    offset = 0
+    for family, younger, j in cases:
+        assert presumption(younger)[2][j]
+        assert not roles[offset + j], family
+        assert not roles[offset + len(family) + j], younger
+        offset += 2 * len(family)
+
+
+@PROPERTY_SETTINGS
+@given(arbitrary_benefit_units())
+def test_effective_children_and_partners_are_disjoint(families):
+    # An identified parent (an HBAI adult flagged is_parent) takes priority
+    # over the presumption. Every other presumed child is an effective child,
+    # and no effective child is ever the partner (nor the claimant).
+    roles = simulate(families).calculate("is_claimant_or_partner", YEAR)
+    offset = 0
+    for family in families:
+        _, adult, presumed = presumption(family)
+        for i, p in enumerate(family):
+            effective_child = presumed[i] and not (adult[i] and p["is_parent"])
+            assert not (effective_child and roles[offset + i]), family
+        offset += len(family)
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_council_tax_reduction_pensioner_earnings_disregard_properties.py b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_council_tax_reduction_pensioner_earnings_disregard_properties.py
index c40751e943..dafb5dd601 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_council_tax_reduction_pensioner_earnings_disregard_properties.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_council_tax_reduction_pensioner_earnings_disregard_properties.py
@@ -370,8 +370,9 @@ def test_housing_benefit_disregard_is_the_statutory_weekly_sum_in_every_year(
 
 def test_disabled_working_age_single_gets_the_special_hb_disregard():
     # The property above reads special eligibility from the model, so pin it
-    # here. With no hours the additional sum cannot apply, and tax credits
-    # have ended by 2026, so the working tax credit route is off.
+    # here. A disabled working-age single has the disability premium, which
+    # gives the £20 (SI 2006/213 Sch 4 para 3); with no hours the additional
+    # sum cannot apply.
     unit = dict(
         shape="single",
         nation="ENGLAND",
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_salary_sacrifice_ni_measure_properties.py b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_salary_sacrifice_ni_measure_properties.py
index 5251df7f06..d737326620 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_salary_sacrifice_ni_measure_properties.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_salary_sacrifice_ni_measure_properties.py
@@ -13,8 +13,9 @@
 the model's own liability variables, so it does not depend on the formulas
 under test.
 
-Invariants, for any pay, salary sacrifice, age, statutory sick pay and
-employer pension contribution:
+Invariants, for any pay, salary sacrifice, age, statutory sick pay, employer
+pension contribution, full-year Category A director status and apprentice
+status:
 
 1. Difference of complete liabilities: the employee measure equals
    ni_class_1_employee with the excess less ni_class_1_employee
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_statutory_paternity_pay_income_tax_properties.py b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_statutory_paternity_pay_income_tax_properties.py
index e57c68a792..ad32b4fee5 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_statutory_paternity_pay_income_tax_properties.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_statutory_paternity_pay_income_tax_properties.py
@@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ def test_income_tax_never_falls_as_statutory_paternity_pay_rises(population):
                 )
                 + results.family_total("CB_HITC", i, LOW)
             )
+            # This margin relies on even-pound base incomes: PAY's
+            # 388.64 -> 389 pair cannot cross a personal-allowance
+            # taper-rounding step.
             assert gain <= family["high"] - family["low"] + TOLERANCE, family
 
 
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_wales_childcare_offer_income_sources.py b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_wales_childcare_offer_income_sources.py
index fd3ae03c78..3508c8ffed 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/tests/test_wales_childcare_offer_income_sources.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/tests/test_wales_childcare_offer_income_sources.py
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
 would just lose its case; the lists are also pinned to the reviewed sources
 below, so a removal fails here too. Each source is also checked not to add
 another listed source (through adds or subtracts, at any depth), which would
-count it twice. That check does not see a formula that reads another listed
-source.
+count it twice, and the sources are checked to expand to disjoint variables.
+Those checks do not see a formula that reads another listed source.
 """
 
 from pathlib import Path
@@ -156,3 +156,18 @@ def test_each_list_holds_the_reviewed_sources_once(name):
 def test_no_listed_source_adds_another(entity, source):
     listed = {other for _, other in CASES}
     assert not components(source) & listed
+
+
+def test_listed_sources_expand_to_disjoint_variables():
+    # Each source's closure is the source and every variable it adds or
+    # subtracts, at any depth. Overlapping closures would count the shared
+    # income twice, even where neither source adds the other.
+    closures = {source: {source} | components(source) for _, source in CASES}
+    overlaps = {
+        (first, second): sorted(closures[first] & closures[second])
+        for i, first in enumerate(closures)
+        for second in list(closures)[i + 1 :]
+        if closures[first] & closures[second]
+    }
+    assert len(closures) == 40
+    assert not overlaps, overlaps
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/utils/pensions.py b/policyengine_uk/utils/pensions.py
index 8b5ecb3ff0..be14ef3e7c 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/utils/pensions.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/utils/pensions.py
@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ def relevant_uk_earnings(person, period, hmrc):
     """FA 2004 s.189(2) relevant UK earnings.
 
     Employment income chargeable to income tax is net taxable earnings
-    (ITEPA 2003 ss.9(2) and 11): pay and employer-paid taxable SSP/SMP, which
-    the model holds separately from wages, less the allowable expenses in
-    s.327(3). s.327(5) also lists the deductions for pension contributions
+    (ITEPA 2003 ss.9(2) and 11): pay and employer-paid taxable SSP, SMP and
+    SPP (employment_benefits), which the model holds separately from wages,
+    less the allowable expenses in s.327(3). s.327(5) also lists the deductions for pension contributions
     (FA 2004 ss.188-194), but those are the relief that these earnings limit,
     so they are not taken off; the limit would otherwise depend on itself.
     Trading income is the profit chargeable under ITTOIA 2005 Part 2, before
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_applicable_income.py b/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_applicable_income.py
index 7d393e0df8..49c6d82786 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_applicable_income.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_applicable_income.py
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ class housing_benefit_applicable_income(Variable):
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/214/regulation/23",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/214/regulation/29",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2006/405/regulation/22",
-        "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2006/405/schedule/6/paragraph/64",
+        "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2009/276/regulation/3/made",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2006/405/schedule/6/paragraph/32",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2006/406/regulation/21",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2006/406/regulation/27",
@@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ class housing_benefit_applicable_income(Variable):
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/213/regulation/40",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/213/schedule/5/paragraph/16",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/213/schedule/5/paragraph/47",
-        "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/214/regulation/29",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/214/regulation/26",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/214/regulation/27",
         "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2006/406/regulation/24",
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_applicable_income_disregard.py b/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_applicable_income_disregard.py
index 7de5c94a3d..ed00e229ab 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_applicable_income_disregard.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_applicable_income_disregard.py
@@ -42,7 +42,9 @@ class housing_benefit_applicable_income_disregard(Variable):
     def formula(benunit, period, parameters):
         p = parameters(period).gov.dwp.housing_benefit.means_test.income_disregard
         net_earnings = benunit("housing_benefit_net_earnings", period)
-        # Working age Sch 4 paras 4, 7 and 10; pension age Sch 4 paras 2 and 7.
+        # Working age Sch 4 paras 3, 4, 7 and 10; pension age Sch 4 paras 2,
+        # 4, 5 and 7. Other full-amount £20 routes are pre-assessed
+        # (housing_benefit_special_earnings_disregard_eligible).
         standard = benunit("housing_benefit_special_earnings_disregard", period)
         # Working age Sch 4 para 18 (NI Sch 5 para 18), from 5 October 2026:
         # specified or temporary accommodation. It applies alongside paras 3
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_special_earnings_disregard_eligible.py b/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_special_earnings_disregard_eligible.py
index f1735a222f..47569ec0e2 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_special_earnings_disregard_eligible.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/applicable_income/housing_benefit_special_earnings_disregard_eligible.py
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 class housing_benefit_special_earnings_disregard_eligible(Variable):
     """Implement the working-age premium route and the modelled pension-age
-    paragraph 5 qualifying routes.
+    carer (paragraph 4) and paragraph 5 qualifying routes.
 
     GB SI 2006/214 Sch. 4 and NI SR 2006/406 Sch. 5 para. 5(1)(a)
     list the following receipts implemented here:
diff --git a/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/household_benefits_individual_non_dep_deduction.py b/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/household_benefits_individual_non_dep_deduction.py
index 36d14136a9..2bec92df06 100644
--- a/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/household_benefits_individual_non_dep_deduction.py
+++ b/policyengine_uk/variables/gov/dwp/housing_benefit/non_dep_deduction/household_benefits_individual_non_dep_deduction.py
@@ -33,11 +33,12 @@ def formula(person, period, parameters):
         # instead of an income band. Reg 6(6) excludes income-related
         # recipients from remunerative work. The gate only lowers a
         # deduction: a non-worker with no banding income keeps the scale's
-        # zero, because the exemptions in reg 74(6)-(10) and reg 55(6)-(9)
-        # (a claimant on Attendance Allowance; a non-dependant on Pension
-        # Credit, or under 25 on Income Support; a full-time student) are not
-        # modelled, and the income-related benefits are not banding income,
-        # so many such non-dependants have none.
+        # zero, because the exemptions in reg 74(6), (7), (8) and (10),
+        # and reg 55(6)-(9) (a claimant on Attendance Allowance; a
+        # non-dependant on Pension Credit, or under 25 on Income Support;
+        # a full-time student) are not modelled, and the income-related
+        # benefits are not banding income, so many such non-dependants
+        # have none.
         # #2007 adds the exemptions and the flat charge together.
         deduction = where(
             in_remunerative_work,